Startup India “Action Plan

Startup India “Action Plan” – Intellectual Property Outlook

The Start-up India initiative unveiled by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 16th January 2016 is being applauded globally. It’s being seen not only as an initiative to create a robust entrepreneurial ecosystem in the country but also as a way to create job opportunities, a critical ingredient of sustained economic growth.

The proposed action plan may not have much for existing start-ups; however, it will definitely pave the way for new start-ups. This blog analyses the IP-related proposals announced in the action plan.

 What exactly is a Start-up?

The proposed action plan has defined the term “start-up” for the purpose of determining eligibility for the various benefits under this start-up action plan. However, various aspects of this definition are not fully clear at this time and will need to be clarified as we go forward.

 A “start-up” is defined as a legal entity registered in India not more than 5 years ago as a Private Limited Company, or Partnership Firm or Limited Liability Partnership. This entity should be working towards innovation, development, deployment or commercialization of new products, processes or services driven by technology or intellectual property. Further, the annual turnover of the entity should not have exceeded INR 25 Crore (approximately US$3.8 Million) in any preceding financial year.

The definition precludes entities formed by splitting up or reconstruction of a business already in existence. Also, an entity shall cease to be a “start-up” if its turnover for the previous financial year has exceeded INR 25 Crore or it has completed 5 years from the date of its incorporation.

Apart from the aforementioned criteria, an entity, to qualify as a “start-up”, must be:

  • supported by an incubator established in a post-graduate college in India, or
  • supported by an incubator which is funded from GoI as part of any specified scheme to promote innovation; or
  • supported by an incubator recognised by GoI; or
  • funded by an Incubation Fund/Angel Fund/ Private Equity Fund/ Accelerator/Angel Network duly registered with SEBI that endorses the “innovative nature of the business”; or
  • funded by GOI as part of any GoI scheme to promote innovation; or 
  • granted a patent by the Indian Patent Office in areas affiliated with the nature of business it promotes.
  • The proposed action plan suggests that the DIPP (Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion) may publish a ‘negative’ list of funds which are not eligible for this initiative.

 Action Plan and Intellectual Property

The tight definition of “start-ups” is clearly aimed at promoting technology based and innovation-driven start-ups. This signals that the government has taken a deliberate decision that minimizes the risk of the scheme being misused to just dole out subsidies and cash benefits.

Sub Section 4 of Section 2.1 of the proposed action plan mentions provision of “legal support” and “fast tracking patent examination”. The main actions being proposed to promote creation and protection of IP by “start-ups” are as follow:

“Fast track” patent applications of start-ups;

  1. Formation of a panel of facilitators empanelled by the Controller general of Patents & Trademarks to assist start-ups in filing and disposal of Patent, Trademark and Design applications;
  2. The cost of these facilitators to be borne by the Government for any number of Patents, trademarks or designs filed by the start-ups
  3. The statutory fee to be borne by the Start-ups; however, start-ups are to be provided an 80% rebate in the statutory fees for filing of Patent
  4.  The proposed IP scheme is to be launched on pilot basis for one year only.


Though the start-up fraternity seems to be gung-ho about the proposed action plan, it remains to be seen how start-ups actually benefit. The proposed rebate on patent filing is nothing new as the government has already been giving rebates to SMEs. Also, government-run organisations such as TIFAC are already assisting Universities/Institutions and SMEs in bearing legal cost for protecting their IPs.

The proposed action plan appears to have been made in a hurry without much thought being given to the implementation. Some contradictions seem to exist. For instance, the Government of India has just proposed new Trademark Rules under which the statutory fees have been increased by 100% (without any rebate provision for SMEs or start-ups). Moreover, the action plan proposes a rebate on statutory fee only for Patents and not Trademark or Design.

Implementing this proposal would also require a substantial change to various IP laws in India. But all things considered, we hope that this initiative will encourage Indian entrepreneurs to innovate in India- at least for the one year in which this initiative is to be piloted.

Source: Start-up India Action Plan 2016

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *